Two of Australia’s most acclaimed journalists are actually liars and frauds. So is Channel Nine, the corrupt media network that employs them. Nothing that McKenzie or Grieve write or say can be believed. The same goes for any broadcast aired on 60 Minutes Australia. It’s likely that none of the awards these two fake journalists won were deserved, as their work was likely just as fraudulent as the defamatory 60 Minutes broadcast they produced about me and my bank. 60 Minutes is fake news, and McKenzie and Grieve are not real journalists. Journalist seek out and report the truth. But Mckenzie and Grieve have no interest in the truth. Their only goals are ratings and advancing their radical left political agendas. In pursuit of these goals they will lie and defraud their readers and audience. They will falsify the results of their own investigations and knowingly report lies as if they were true. They are a disgrace to their profession.
I sued 60 Minutes Australia, the Age, Nick Mckenzie, Charlotte Grieve, and Joel Tozer for defamation in Australia. Not only did I win a complete victory, but the respondents couldn’t even submit a valid defense. They submitted three defenses, all of which were thrown out by the judge for lack of evidence. In total I won a record seven consecutive judgments against all five respondents, an Australian record.
Discovery revealed that the allegations made against me and my bank were not only false, but that Mckenzie and Grieve knew they were false at the time they were made. In both the Age article and 60 Minutes broadcast, they fabricated evidence and concealed exculpatory evidence. They not only misquoted and took their interview subjects out of context, but they deliberately lied about what they said.
Not only did they not have any evidence to support any of the seven defamatory imputations the court ruled were carried by the 60 Minutes Broadcast, but all of the evidence they gathered as a result of their own investigation, proved their imputations were false. Yet for two years they lied to the court that they possessed proof that they knew they did not have.
This website is dedicated to proving that Mckenzie and Grieve are liars and frauds, mainly by presenting their own evidence. If they had not destroyed all of their text messages I would have even more. But even the evidence they did not destroy proves that nothing they say or write can be trusted. They have no ethics or journalistic integrity.
In fact, they even went to court to try to restrain me from making the unedited video of my 60 Minutes interview, which I finally obtained in discovery, available to the public. They argued that the public does not have a right to see the inner workings of a broadcaster. They withdrew their motion following a warning from the judge that forcing him to rule would embarrass Grieve and McKenzie and be harmful to their reputations. This website will also expose the corruption of government officials from the IRS, Australia, the UK, and Puerto Rico, all of whom conspired to frame an innocent bank purely as a publicity stunt. All the evidence, taken from their own emails obtained through FOIA requests, proves this allegation is true.
So behold the inner workings of a corrupt broadcaster, corrupt “journalists,” and corrupt government officials.
This website has also evolved to expose the illegal conspiracy between the IRS, J5, and OCIF to frame Euro Pacific Bank for tax evasion and money laundering merely as a publicity stunt. The IRS leveraged the negative light cast on Puerto Rico’s banking industry by the defamatory 60 Minutes broadcast to convince OCIF to shut down the bank, so that the shutdown could be used both to turn the J5’s failed Atlantis investigation, touted by 60 Minutes, into a fake success, and as evidence that Puerto Rico was not a high-risk tax haven.
The shutdown also served the interests of McKenzie and Grieve, as they introduced the shutdown as evidence in my defamation lawsuit to try to prove their allegations were true. But the judge rejected this attempt, as the official reasons given by OCIF to justify the shutdown had nothing to do with the allegations of money laundering or tax evasion.
The existence of this conspiracy is not a theory. It is a fact demonstrated in the IRS’s own emails obtained through FOIA. The IRS is still refusing to turn over more evidence a federal court has ordered it to produce. That failure is the subject of ongoing legal actions to force the IRS to comply with the law. So not only did IRS agents break the law to get OCIF to shut down my bank, but other agents are breaking the law with a coverup.