In this affidavit, Peter Schiff lays out the basic timeline: the EPB–Qenta PAA, the assets transferred in reliance on it, the absence of any completed customer migration, and Qenta’s subsequent refusal to return what it held. The affidavit frames the dispute as an urgent preservation problem: once assets are moved, encumbered, or liquidated, an arbitration award becomes meaningless. It also highlights the reputational harm caused when a financial-services brand is publicly accused while the underlying evidence points to a custody and control dispute, not criminal conduct.
